You stop and have a good long lunch (usually with multiple courses, not including the fruit and/or yogurt and/or dessert that will inevitably follow), and then you sit around the table and talk with your family, you have a nice cafe con leche or a tea, maybe some of those delicious cinnamon cookies that I can't believe we don't have back home, and then if the mood strikes you, you take a nap. It's fantastic. It's also damn un-American. We don't do things like this in the US, mostly because we have a completely different value structure. As much as it stings to hear it (and trust me it hurts to type it too) we as a society are materialistic, individualistic, and completely consumed with having things. Those values affect our choices; we work through lunch because that's time we can bill for, which is the same reason that we work overtime, because we want that money so that we can buy nice things that will show everyone else how well we are doing financially, and that therefore our lives must be better than theirs. And of course this translates in terrible ways when it isn't just individuals, but also corporations, and also people in power. Suddenly the idea that we should work hard and be industrious and not take breaks for lunch translates into employers giving their workers only the legally required breaks (Have you ever heard of a two hour lunch break in the US? Me neither. Meanwhile, they're pretty standard here.) and expecting them to pick up extra shifts because who wouldn't want the extra money? Our drive to be individuals quickly translates into a line of reasoning where not being able to blaze your own trail becomes synonymous with being a bad American, which becomes synonymous with being a bad person. That's why college is unaffordable US, this is why we don't take care of people living in poverty, or the elderly, or really anyone: our chief value is the ability to conquer all obstacles, and that makes us blind to the fact that there are obstacles that are nearly impossible to conquer on your own. (Is this probably at least a bit of an oversimplification? Yes. Does that make me wrong? No.)
So if you've ever wondered if it has to be the way it is in the US, it doesn't. Really it only is that way in the US, and only because we all buy into it. And let me tell you, the Spanish have us beat on this one. So do I think that siestas will solve all of the world's problems? Realistically, probably not. But I do think that treating ourselves and our workers and our citizens like human beings with families and wants and interests and not just bank accounts will fix most things. But that also means treating yourself as more than a consumer, it means not being concerned about having things you don't need, it means lowering your standards. In fact, that's probably the biggest challenge out there, but it carries the biggest rewards. For starters, traveling is 100% more doable when you dramatically lower your standards: you can stay at a hostel that costs about $20 a night, and you can wear the same bra three days in a row instead of packing more. These things will not kill you. You will be fine, and you'll also get to go to amazing places and have money left over for things like fantastic crepes in the Jardin des Tuileries in Paris.
Just some things to think on.
Hasta luego,
Isabel.